Day: April 27, 2019

A sadness has come over Adam Schiff. His arousal is reluctantly subsiding now that President Trump has been found by Special Counsel Robert Mueller not to have “colluded with the Russians”, as Schiff has screamed from the rooftops for two years, nonstop. The prospects of an impeachment, led by Schiff, is slowly fading into the rear view mirror as the nation turns to real issues facing them and the country, while he clenches his fists, red faced, and seems to say “But wait!, But wait! There has to be more! Here! Or there! Or Somewhere!”
It must be hard to let go of the prospects that a fantasy will come true, when everyone else knows it will not.

It seems that some people are happy to put the newest and next things into their home in the quest for the ultimate convenience. What cost to your privacy is apparently way down the list of concerns and considerations for those on the latest-and-greatest quest…but should it be more carefully assessed?

The Left has a tactic they often use against their enemies. They intentionally misunderstand, or mis-hear, or simply make up a quote by someone, then attack their victim for being horrible to have said it, when they never said it in the first place. But with multiple media outlets from TV to print and all over the internet, as is commonly known, a lie repeated often enough becomes accepted as truth eventually. A perfect case-in-point were Trump’s comments on the tragedy in Charlottesville. Of course the left promoted the false narrative. It is what they do.
A quote illustrating this is “A lie gets halfway around the world in the morning, before the truth gets its pants on.”

Parents usually care about giving their kids the best opportunity they can to insure their future prospects, and a good education is at the top of the list in those regards. But shelling out $6.5 million dollars just to get them into a college?

Having had pretty much free reign as they blazed the new tech frontiers, giant tech companies have been basically writing their own rules. Now that they are showing overt signs of abusing the public’s trust, especially in privacy issues, how do governments worldwide begin to pull them back into the lanes in which the public expects them to stay? Good question.

Mark Zuckerberg is not asking to have the government regulate Facebook because he wants Facebook to be restrained, so why is he? Obviously he penned his Op-Ed in The Washington Post at the end of March with some Facebook advantage in mind, he has never acted in any other way. So why does he think more stringent government regulations would benefit Facebook?